Brian Cryer wrote:
> "Blinky the Shark" <no.spam@box.invalid> wrote in message
> news:slrnfdj4ln.j6n.no.spam@thurston.blinkynet.net ...
>> Brian Cryer wrote:
>>> "Blinky the Shark" <no.spam@box.invalid> wrote in message
>>> news:slrnfdi1dp.6d8.no.spam@thurston.blinkynet.net ...
><snip>
>>> If it were me I'd abandon the script (thereby side stepping the issue)
>>> and replace it with either someone elses or write my own. Since you're
>>> capable, I'd suggest going the route of putting your own together.
>>> That way you could also get rid of those pesky <font> tags (grin).
>>
>> Thanks for your input, Brian.
>>
>> Re font tags, I looked for stuff like that before publishing the code.
>> I dont' see any in the two pages (form and confirmation) for the email.
>
> Well, if there aren't any font tags in the original then my appologies. I

Oh, no prob, Brian. I didn't take that as a dig.

> was looking at
> http://web.archive.org/web/200401010...sthatwork.com/ and
> then followed the link to "Click here to see the code", and its there under
> "Step 1".

I get the bullshit new page for scriptsthatwork.com when I click that
link at the old page you link for the wayback machine.

> Glad that you screen your pages. Unfortunatly if you look hard at mine I
> think there might still be a font tag or three lurking there somewhere.

Tell you what: I won't, then. 'Kay?

But yeah, they're small.


--
Blinky RLU 297263
Killing all posts from Google Groups
The Usenet Improvement Project:
http://improve-usenet.org <----------- New Site Aug 28