PHWinfo - Afficher un message

30/08/2007, 05h54

Ignoramus31174 wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Aug 2007 23:34:40 +0100, Martin Harran
> <nospam@martinharran.com> wrote:
>> <rant_mode>
>>
>> WTF do people still send out bounces for non-existent email
>> addresses? Some f**ker is using one of my domains for dictionary
>> style spamming and I got nearly 2K bounces this morning.
>>
>> I hate people who set up these bounces almost as much as I hate
>> spammers.
>>
>> </rant_mode>
>>
>>
>
> You could not be more wrong. Also use procmail to filter the nounces
> out, temporarily.
>
He isnt wrong. If you cant bounce DURING the SMTP connection you should NOT
bounce at all.
It is reportable to SpamCop...
http://www.spamcop.net/fom-serve/cache/329.html

30/08/2007, 05h54	#4
Viper Messages: n/a Hébergeur:	Re: Autoresponders to Spam (Rant) Ignoramus31174 wrote: > On Wed, 29 Aug 2007 23:34:40 +0100, Martin Harran > <nospam@martinharran.com> wrote: >> <rant_mode> >> >> WTF do people still send out bounces for non-existent email >> addresses? Some f**ker is using one of my domains for dictionary >> style spamming and I got nearly 2K bounces this morning. >> >> I hate people who set up these bounces almost as much as I hate >> spammers. >> >> </rant_mode> >> >> > > You could not be more wrong. Also use procmail to filter the nounces > out, temporarily. > He isnt wrong. If you cant bounce DURING the SMTP connection you should NOT bounce at all. It is reportable to SpamCop... http://www.spamcop.net/fom-serve/cache/329.html