28/08/2007, 22h20
|
#4
|
|
|
Re: www or no-www?
Red E. Kilowatt wrote:
> Michael Fesser <netizen@gmx.de> wrote in message:
> sb06d3pil6r6b26f63mcqg6cbv173cb6bs@4ax.com,
>
>> .oO(SpaceGirl)
>>
>>> Hmm... redirect? Well I usually advertise the non WWW version of a
>>> domain, but at the server www & non-www are resolved by the same web
>>> site instance in IIS... no redirecting. It's the same site.
>> From a UAs point of view http://www.example.com and http://example.com
>> are two entirely different servers, hence two different sites. Using
>> both URLs without redirecting leads to duplicated content in search
>> engines, proxy caches etc. A bad idea. There should be only _one_
>> canonical URL, the other(s) should be redirected with a 301 status.
>>
>> Micha
>
> Well, at least we can all agree on that. :-)
Perhaps!
--
x theSpaceGirl (miranda)
http://www.northleithmill.com
-.-
Kammy has a new home: http://www.bitesizedjapan.com
|
|
|
|