Discussion: Re: www or no-www?
Afficher un message
Vieux 28/08/2007, 22h20   #4
SpaceGirl
Aucun Avatar
 
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur:
Par défaut Re: www or no-www?

Red E. Kilowatt wrote:
> Michael Fesser <netizen@gmx.de> wrote in message:
> sb06d3pil6r6b26f63mcqg6cbv173cb6bs@4ax.com,
>
>> .oO(SpaceGirl)
>>
>>> Hmm... redirect? Well I usually advertise the non WWW version of a
>>> domain, but at the server www & non-www are resolved by the same web
>>> site instance in IIS... no redirecting. It's the same site.

>> From a UAs point of view http://www.example.com and http://example.com
>> are two entirely different servers, hence two different sites. Using
>> both URLs without redirecting leads to duplicated content in search
>> engines, proxy caches etc. A bad idea. There should be only _one_
>> canonical URL, the other(s) should be redirected with a 301 status.
>>
>> Micha

>
> Well, at least we can all agree on that. :-)


Perhaps!


--

x theSpaceGirl (miranda)

http://www.northleithmill.com

-.-

Kammy has a new home: http://www.bitesizedjapan.com
  Réponse avec citation
 
Page generated in 0,05199 seconds with 9 queries