Ignoramus19946 <ignoramus19946@NOSPAM.19946.invalid> wrote in
news:roKdnddM8-y3407bnZ2dnUVZ_jCdnZ2d@giganews.com:

> If she wrote it "for" someone, it is that somone's property.
>

Actual ownership of copyrights (including all source code) remains in the
hands of the creator of the work except in instances where that material
was created as part of an established "work-for-hire" agreement. There are
well established guidelines used to determine a work-for-hire including
things like whether the person was paid and whether the "client" had
control over the "employee" in terms of where, when, and how the work was
created.

While good taste may seem to indicate otherwise, the site's creator owns
the site in this case because this does not sound like a work-for-hire
arrangement.




--
Karl Groves
http://www.8pistons.com
http://www.thehotrodclassifieds.com
http://www.grayscalecms.com
http://www.karlcore.com