Discussion: Re: www or no-www?
Afficher un message
Vieux 27/08/2007, 20h05   #3
Red E. Kilowatt
Aucun Avatar
 
Messages: n/a
Hébergeur:
Par défaut Re: www or no-www?

Michael Fesser <netizen@gmx.de> wrote in message:
sb06d3pil6r6b26f63mcqg6cbv173cb6bs@4ax.com,

> .oO(SpaceGirl)
>
>> Hmm... redirect? Well I usually advertise the non WWW version of a
>> domain, but at the server www & non-www are resolved by the same web
>> site instance in IIS... no redirecting. It's the same site.

>
> From a UAs point of view http://www.example.com and http://example.com
> are two entirely different servers, hence two different sites. Using
> both URLs without redirecting leads to duplicated content in search
> engines, proxy caches etc. A bad idea. There should be only _one_
> canonical URL, the other(s) should be redirected with a 301 status.
>
> Micha


Well, at least we can all agree on that. :-)

--
Red


  Réponse avec citation
 
Page generated in 0,04767 seconds with 9 queries