Well... It certainly looks like I've got it installed...

However, the version that's available from the "etch" mirrors (and
installed on my machine) doesn't seem to be the same as that on the
website that Mathieu mentions. Is it just that it hasn't migrated to
"testing" from "unstable" yet? Will all this clear itself up when it
gets migrated?

In the mean time, why have things signed by it been allowed to get
into the "testing" archive?


> rick@macswell:~$ aptitude show debian-archive-keyring
> Package: debian-archive-keyring
> State: installed
> Automatically installed: no
> Version: 2006.01.18
> Priority: important
> Section: misc
> Maintainer: Michael Vogt <mvo@debian.org>
> Uncompressed Size: 53.2k
> Depends: gnupg (>= 1.0.6-4)
> Description: GnuPG archive keys of the Debian archive
> The Debian project digitally signs its Release files. This package
> contains the
> archive keys used for that.
>
> rick@macswell:~$



On Dec 2, 2006, at 8:04 PM, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:

> Have you tried installing:
>
> http://packages.debian.org/unstable/...rchive-keyring
>
> HTH
> -M
>
> On 12/2/06, Rick Thomas <rbthomas55@pobox.com> wrote:
>>
>> Does anybody know why I'm getting this message when I do "aptitude
>> update"
>>
>> > W: GPG error: http://mirrors.usc.edu etch Release: The following
>> > signatures were invalid: BADSIG 010908312D230C5F Debian Archive
>> > Automatic Signing Key (2006) <ftpmaster@debian.org>
>>
>> A couple of days ago, I was getting the same message, but from
>> debian.lcs.mit.edu, instead of mirrors.usc.edu. Both sites are in my
>> sources.list file.


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org