Per Hedeland wrote:

> >I know that the direct hacking at the rulesets can do anything, but
> >would be glad to find a more or less ready-made solution.

> Yes, it can be done with a custom mailer definition of course - look at
> e.g. how the esmtp mailer turns out in the .cf with and without
> masquerade_envelope and/or allmasquerade (which adds header recipient),
> and you can probably figure out how it should look to achieve what you
> want.

I am sorry but adding

MASQUERADE_AS(`domain.com')
FEATURE(masquerade_envelope)

to the .mc file does not produce any changes in the mailer
definitions. It only modifies the rulesets.

Any more ideas?

--
Victor Sudakov, VAS4-RIPE, VAS47-RIPN
2:5005/49@fidonet http://vas.tomsk.ru/