Thanks a bunch Arnie for totally clearing things up on this for me. Much
appreciated.

Take care.

J


"Arnie Rowland" <arnie@1568.com> wrote in message
news:ema1VyR$GHA.3528@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
> CAL belong to a device (computer). Server with 5 CALs does NOT mean five
> concurrent users -it means licenses for 5 specific devices. Those CALs
> cannot be shared amongst a larger number of users. Imagine an organization
> with 500 users/computers; only 125 users ever have a need to connect to
> SQL Server, however, the maximum number of users ever connected at one
> time is only 25. Having 25 CALs would be a license violation - the correct
> number is 125. And the SQL Server is providing data to a web application,
> then every user of the web application needs a CAL. If it is a public web
> application, then there is an 'unlimited' number of users
>
> A processor license allows unlimited connections for unlimited users.
> However, hardware performance considerations may provide a practical limit
> that can be changed with hardware changes.
>
> For the definitive answer to licensing questions, call:
>
> Licensing -VL Contact
> (800) 426-9400
>
> --
> Arnie Rowland, Ph.D.
> Westwood Consulting, Inc
>
> Most good judgment comes from experience.
> Most experience comes from bad judgment.
> - Anonymous
>
> You can't someone get up a hill without getting a little closer to
> the top yourself.
> - H. Norman Schwarzkopf
>
>
> "J" <IDontLikeSpam@Nowhere.com> wrote in message
> news:OsmVEoR$GHA.4268@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>> Hello. Sorry if this is a basic question but I don't think I quite
>> understand the CAL for SQL Server 2005 licensing. According to
>> microsoft's site:
>>
>> http://www.microsoft.com/sql/howtobuy/default.mspx
>>
>> is there a limit on how many concurrent connections there are for the
>> "Processor License"? Does the "$1,849 with 5 CALs" mean that only 5
>> users can connect to it concurrently under the "Server plus User/Device
>> CALs"?
>>
>> Any info would be appreciated.
>>
>> J
>>
>
>