Big Bill <kruse@cityscape.co.uk> wrote:

> On 29 Aug 2006 06:20:40 GMT, John Bokma <john@castleamber.com> wrote:
>
>>"Timmermans" <steventimmermans@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>>
>>> Those who make sure their site is accessible for the blind should
>>> also get an advantage. I've been reading alot on W3 lately.
>>> There's so much stuff that can be done and so much that is
>>> recommended, it doesn't make things easier and if anything it adds
>>> to the code, not the content. I can't say I've seen any search
>>> engine rewarding for putting in the extra effort to make sure a site
>>> is accessable or uses valid code.
>>
>>The major problem SEs like Google have is that they have to stick to
>>the majority of crap out there. They just can't afford to change the
>>rules of the game too drastic.
>
> If they did, as I've said time and again with respect to validation
> and spamming in general, they'd have no index.

And probably a lot of law suits :-)

--
John Need with SEO? Get started with a SEO report of your site:

--> http://johnbokma.com/websitedesign/seo-expert-.html