PHWinfo - Afficher un message

26/08/2006, 19h31

On Sat, 26 Aug 2006 19:56:46 +0200, "Jezsta Web Productions"
<Please-use-our-contact-form@jezsta.com> wrote:

>"John Bokma" <john@castleamber.com> wrote in message
>news:Xns982B7CA64A8F4castleamber@130.133.1.4...
>> "Royceee" <royce.bathrooms@btconnect.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello
>>>
>>> Although my site is doing pretty well on Google, Im searching for ways
>>> to make it do better, I have got some links coming into my site which
>>> has made my PR good but im looking for ways to further improve my
>>> search engine results.
>>> I read that untidy code and more code than content can slow things
>>> down. Is this true?
>>
>> Yes and no. Untidy code as in code that doesn't validate *might* result
>> in a SE misunderstanding your code. Also, untidy code could mean that
>> you're using HTML in the wrong way, for example:
>>
>> <h1>Perl support by an expert Perl programmer</h1>
>>
>> is good
>>
>> <tr><td><font size="6" face="...."><b><i>Support</i></b></font></td>
>> </tr>
>
>Also clean code is easier to follow when making additions to the site that
>you need to add html and not do it with an editor. You can easily mess up
>when it isn't straight with less fluff. I know I have done it. But if it
>isn't a very important page and you can make changes without a disaster then
>fine.
>
>I am working on this site and had to add a calendar
>http://www.houstonpianist.com/calend...nt-booking.htm
>. Over 1300 lines of code with a lot of fluff. I can move over a lot with
>CSS and even have a CSS in place and have started cleaning out a bit. But
>you know it isn't worth it as the calendar isn't going to rank anyway. But
>it is valid error free code, messy but it is fine. To me it was easier to
>fix the errors than make it totally neat and tidy.:-) All the main pages are
>neat and tidy.
>
>Stacey

I'm toying with the concept of Care Rank. Google wanting to see sites
that someone takes seriously enough to care about, so they make sure
it validates ok. I don't think Trust Rank and Page Rank quite cover
what's out there. Care Rank is a factor also.

BB
--

http://www.crystal-liaison.com/comfo...les/index.html
http://www.crystal-liaison.com/cryst...-new-york.html
http://www.kruse.co.uk/search-engine...n-firms-uk.htm

26/08/2006, 19h31	#5
Big Bill Messages: n/a Hébergeur:	Re: Improveing my seo On Sat, 26 Aug 2006 19:56:46 +0200, "Jezsta Web Productions" <Please-use-our-contact-form@jezsta.com> wrote: >"John Bokma" <john@castleamber.com> wrote in message >news:Xns982B7CA64A8F4castleamber@130.133.1.4... >> "Royceee" <royce.bathrooms@btconnect.com> wrote: >> >>> Hello >>> >>> Although my site is doing pretty well on Google, Im searching for ways >>> to make it do better, I have got some links coming into my site which >>> has made my PR good but im looking for ways to further improve my >>> search engine results. >>> I read that untidy code and more code than content can slow things >>> down. Is this true? >> >> Yes and no. Untidy code as in code that doesn't validate might result >> in a SE misunderstanding your code. Also, untidy code could mean that >> you're using HTML in the wrong way, for example: >> >> <h1>Perl support by an expert Perl programmer</h1> >> >> is good >> >> <tr><td><font size="6" face="...."><b><i>Support</i></b></font></td> >> </tr> > >Also clean code is easier to follow when making additions to the site that >you need to add html and not do it with an editor. You can easily mess up >when it isn't straight with less fluff. I know I have done it. But if it >isn't a very important page and you can make changes without a disaster then >fine. > >I am working on this site and had to add a calendar >http://www.houstonpianist.com/calend...nt-booking.htm >. Over 1300 lines of code with a lot of fluff. I can move over a lot with >CSS and even have a CSS in place and have started cleaning out a bit. But >you know it isn't worth it as the calendar isn't going to rank anyway. But >it is valid error free code, messy but it is fine. To me it was easier to >fix the errors than make it totally neat and tidy.:-) All the main pages are >neat and tidy. > >Stacey I'm toying with the concept of Care Rank. Google wanting to see sites that someone takes seriously enough to care about, so they make sure it validates ok. I don't think Trust Rank and Page Rank quite cover what's out there. Care Rank is a factor also. BB -- http://www.crystal-liaison.com/comfo...les/index.html http://www.crystal-liaison.com/cryst...-new-york.html http://www.kruse.co.uk/search-engine...n-firms-uk.htm