In article <1159358595.371982.270790@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups .com>
r31dmaeu@unibw.de writes:
>
>r31dmaeu@unibw.de wrote:
>> Many thanks George !
>>
>> In fact, my question was erronous. It sould be "what should be the
>> string which I have to return when leaving my own ruleset 98, in order
>> to say: send to the user ..... via the host .... using the mailer
>> ....." . In fact this information is exactly the special triple to
>> which one the ruleset 0 have to resolve to, but when leaving my own
>> ruleset 98, I do not have to resolve to this triple because the
>> processing will continue especially with the Parse1 ruleset.
>
>As a test to see the further processing of the output of ruleset 98, I
>have tried:
>
>Parse1 < this-mailer : [127.0.0.1] > user < @ umd.edu. >

What makes you think this is valid input to Parse1? If you want to
resolve to a mailer, just do it ParseLocal/98 - it is valid in any
ruleset called from parse/0. There are even examples in cf/README
showing it (using LOCAL_RULE_0 in .mc, which is what you should be doing
of course).

>This is not the expected result. I want the mailer "this-mailer".
>
>What is wrong here ?

Your expectations.

--Per Hedeland
per@hedeland.org