PHWinfo - Afficher un message - What caused configuration change of loading http.config?

06/05/2005, 17h34

Tim wrote:

>> Have you let Red Hat 9 update Apache itself? (Yum, up2date, etc.)

john.j.hudak@comcast.net posted:

> The only updates I have done were to RH9, after it was installed. I
> then installed Apache, and did no updates to it...

And how did you install Apache? From the Red Hat 9 installation files, or
from the Apache website, or both? I'd imagine that the Red Hat 9 supplied
files would install to where I mentioned, and Apache supplied ones could be
anything.

john.j.hudak@comcast.net also previously posted:

>>> The /etc/httpd/conf/httpd.conf file is read only, but it could be
>>> changed to point to the intended htdocs (/usr/local/apache2/htdocs)
>>> where I have my webpages...but, it seems that I should not have to.

>> That's where mine is (the /etc one), on Red Hat 9.0 Linux and Fedora
>> Core 3. One solution might be to make a link from one location to the
>> other.

> Thanks for the suggestion. I am sure that will work as long as RH9
> and/or Apache are not updated....but a question I have is: What is the
> correct (real) directory structure (e.g. the /usr/local/apache2/ or
> /etc/httpd....)?

I don't think there is a *one* correct answer. But since Red Hat 9 Linux
is discontinued, my guess would be to use what the Apache website offers,
and hope that they're consistent in what they do for each subsequent
update.

I've already outlined mine, and that's the same for Red Hat 8 and 9 Linux,
and Fedora Core 1, 2, & 3, so far...

> IIRC, when I built and installed Apache, I used the default directory
> suggestions....

Might be worth uninstalling the lot, and just install once from one
location. Then hopefully you're not getting confused by two different
things messing with each other.

By the way, that message was really hard to read! If you're going to post
through a poor new agent (like Google groups, apparently), PLEASE snip out
extraneous stuff and leave blank lines between quotes and responses!

--
If you insist on e-mailing me, use the reply-to address (it's real but
temporary). But please reply to the group, like you're supposed to.

This message was sent without a virus, please delete some files yourself.

06/05/2005, 17h34	#4
Tim Messages: n/a Hébergeur:	Re: What caused configuration change of loading http.config? Tim wrote: >> Have you let Red Hat 9 update Apache itself? (Yum, up2date, etc.) john.j.hudak@comcast.net posted: > The only updates I have done were to RH9, after it was installed. I > then installed Apache, and did no updates to it... And how did you install Apache? From the Red Hat 9 installation files, or from the Apache website, or both? I'd imagine that the Red Hat 9 supplied files would install to where I mentioned, and Apache supplied ones could be anything. john.j.hudak@comcast.net also previously posted: >>> The /etc/httpd/conf/httpd.conf file is read only, but it could be >>> changed to point to the intended htdocs (/usr/local/apache2/htdocs) >>> where I have my webpages...but, it seems that I should not have to. >> That's where mine is (the /etc one), on Red Hat 9.0 Linux and Fedora >> Core 3. One solution might be to make a link from one location to the >> other. > Thanks for the suggestion. I am sure that will work as long as RH9 > and/or Apache are not updated....but a question I have is: What is the > correct (real) directory structure (e.g. the /usr/local/apache2/ or > /etc/httpd....)? I don't think there is a one correct answer. But since Red Hat 9 Linux is discontinued, my guess would be to use what the Apache website offers, and hope that they're consistent in what they do for each subsequent update. I've already outlined mine, and that's the same for Red Hat 8 and 9 Linux, and Fedora Core 1, 2, & 3, so far... > IIRC, when I built and installed Apache, I used the default directory > suggestions.... Might be worth uninstalling the lot, and just install once from one location. Then hopefully you're not getting confused by two different things messing with each other. By the way, that message was really hard to read! If you're going to post through a poor new agent (like Google groups, apparently), PLEASE snip out extraneous stuff and leave blank lines between quotes and responses! -- If you insist on e-mailing me, use the reply-to address (it's real but temporary). But please reply to the group, like you're supposed to. This message was sent without a virus, please delete some files yourself.