mjt wrote:
> Andy <andyk@no.spam.org> wrote:
>
> > Because the lists are quite specialist, there is no high volume of
> > messages sent and therefore there is no high load for processor or
high
> > bandwidth usage. Thus even servers with 486 type processor with
slow
> > connection to internet would be fine for the lists.
>
>
> ... why not just get broadband and setup a machine yourself?
>
Or for crying out loud, shared hosting isn't expensive - you can get it
under $10.00 a month, and if this content is really worth anything to
the provider or its intended audience, why wouldn't you be willing to
pay?
Even dedicated machines can be had for under $100.00 a month now, and I
expect the $300 and up that a lot of places charge will come down
toward the double digits soon - hardware is so cheap that it's almost
insignificant unless you need incredible performance, which darn few of
us do.
--
Tony Lawrence
http://aplawrence.com (presently running on higher-end shared hosting
though looking at dedicated very seriously recently)