Re: HTML -vs- image cache question
On 8 Feb 2005 11:45:35 -0800,
"fochie" <sborruso@austin.rr.com> posted:
> ExpiresByType text/html "access plus 0 hours"
Make that longer. There's nothing more annoying that navigating through a
site and having to slowly reload a page you just looked at a few minutes
ago, because you have to go back to it to navigate to something else. It's
because of this daft sort of thing that some caches ignore instructions
from servers.
At the very least make it ten minutes. That gives navigation time for most
people, and keeps things current enough for rapidly changing sites. Though
I'd make it at least an hour. It's extremely annoying to try and go back
to read something that caught your interest, only to find that it's gone.
--
If you insist on e-mailing me, use the reply-to address (it's real but
temporary). But please reply to the group, like you're supposed to.
This message was sent without a virus, please delete some files yourself.
|