Re: Why metaclasses?
On 20.06.2008 00:27, James Coglan wrote:
> So far I can't see how this is inconsistent with using metamodules instead
> of metaclasses, and with class inheritance being a special case of module
> inclusion. With apologies for my apparent slow-wittedness, what am I
> missing?
Your quote: "Given that you cannot instantiate them [...]". :-)
Kind regards
robert
|