PHWinfo - Afficher un message

13/03/2008, 16h13

On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 11:27:27 GMT, mt@netscape.net wrote:

>On Wed, 12 Mar 2008 12:24:13 +0200, Dave <d@d.durbs> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>>I use Lightroom all the time -- but not just for a file browser. If all you
>>>need is a browser, I'd choose Bridge. Far from perfect, but a better choice
>>>than ACDSee or something else -- especially if you have CS3.
>>
>>
>>>What version of Bridge are you in? CS3 does me just fine...but, Adobe
>>>really wants you to love Lightroom....IMHO anytime I have to leave the adobe
>>>interface, I am losing time which equals money...so, despite Photoshop and
>>>Bridge being far from perfect, my time is more valuable and I can process
>>>about 5000 images weekly fairly efficiently.
>>
>>
>>
>>>> For the sake of a simple picture browser...
>>>
>>>Irfanview or FastStone
>>
>>>Cliff
>>
>>Many thanks for all the responses.
>>A special thank you to Cliff.
>>First time hearing about FastStone.
>>I downloaded both, Irfanview and FastStone,
>>installed both and immediatly liked 'FastStone'.
>>Even exif reading..!
>>
>>Thanks Cliff
>>
>>Dave
>
>
>I've been using BreezeBrowser Pro for a while; not bad.

Thanks - (and wow..! How many of these are there..!)
I am busy reading the description at
http://www.breezesys.com/BreezeBrowser/
and will try it.
I intend to reinstall an Ghost Image this evening, which means
now is the time to do some experimentation.

13/03/2008, 16h13	#7
Dave Messages: n/a Hébergeur:	Re: ACDSee or Bridge On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 11:27:27 GMT, mt@netscape.net wrote: >On Wed, 12 Mar 2008 12:24:13 +0200, Dave <d@d.durbs> wrote: > >> >> >>>I use Lightroom all the time -- but not just for a file browser. If all you >>>need is a browser, I'd choose Bridge. Far from perfect, but a better choice >>>than ACDSee or something else -- especially if you have CS3. >> >> >>>What version of Bridge are you in? CS3 does me just fine...but, Adobe >>>really wants you to love Lightroom....IMHO anytime I have to leave the adobe >>>interface, I am losing time which equals money...so, despite Photoshop and >>>Bridge being far from perfect, my time is more valuable and I can process >>>about 5000 images weekly fairly efficiently. >> >> >> >>>> For the sake of a simple picture browser... >>> >>>Irfanview or FastStone >> >>>Cliff >> >>Many thanks for all the responses. >>A special thank you to Cliff. >>First time hearing about FastStone. >>I downloaded both, Irfanview and FastStone, >>installed both and immediatly liked 'FastStone'. >>Even exif reading..! >> >>Thanks Cliff >> >>Dave > > >I've been using BreezeBrowser Pro for a while; not bad. Thanks - (and wow..! How many of these are there..!) I am busy reading the description at http://www.breezesys.com/BreezeBrowser/ and will try it. I intend to reinstall an Ghost Image this evening, which means now is the time to do some experimentation.