KatWoman wrote:
> <wxyz321@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:9fa700f1-bfff-46e8-9867-6c2a9588ab80@k2g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
>> On Feb 19, 3:50 pm, "\(not quite so\) Fat Sam"
>> <samandja...@knox.orangehome.co.uk> wrote:
>>
>>> There are plenty
>>> of free wysiwyg HTML editors out there that will still do a better
>>> job than
>>> photoshop, which isn't primarily an HTML editing programme.
>>
>> Thanks for the suggestion, but the site is 95% done, and I really
>> don't have the time nor the desire to start over with a new program.
>> If CS3 can't give me a variable width layer, then I'll post the site
>> "as is" and the people browsing above 1024 can just suffer. It will
>> still look good to most users.
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> Rudy
> not sure how it outputs pages
> there may already be a css doc in there
> or you can try >go to the index html in notepad
> someplace in there should specify size of page
> it needs to be 100% instead of a fixed size
> I THINK
> (not my area of expertise here)
> and why I hate making webpages
> modern designers all use php

PHP, like ASP is just a scripting language which gives a dynamic element to
your webpage.
Your browser still requires a markup language (HTML) to display the elements
of the website to you, and that's exactly what PHP and ASP serves up to your
browser.
Sites are still coded with HTML nowadays, with only those elements that need
dynamic content coded in PHP or ASP.

Having said that, you're absolutely right about the page width needing to be
specified in percentages rather than pixels. That will solve Rudy's problem
for him.

Rudy, if you post the HTML code from one of your pages, I'll be able to tell
you which tag needs to be altered in order to fix the problem.