<wxyz321@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:9fa700f1-bfff-46e8-9867-6c2a9588ab80@k2g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
> On Feb 19, 3:50 pm, "\(not quite so\) Fat Sam"
> <samandja...@knox.orangehome.co.uk> wrote:
>
>> There are plenty
>> of free wysiwyg HTML editors out there that will still do a better job
>> than
>> photoshop, which isn't primarily an HTML editing programme.
>
> Thanks for the suggestion, but the site is 95% done, and I really
> don't have the time nor the desire to start over with a new program.
> If CS3 can't give me a variable width layer, then I'll post the site
> "as is" and the people browsing above 1024 can just suffer. It will
> still look good to most users.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Rudy
not sure how it outputs pages
there may already be a css doc in there
or you can try >go to the index html in notepad
someplace in there should specify size of page
it needs to be 100% instead of a fixed size
I THINK
(not my area of expertise here)
and why I hate making webpages
modern designers all use php