Mike Russell wrote:
> "dvus" <dven1@adelphia.invalid> wrote in message
> news:638vt1F25q6h0U1@mid.individual.net...
>> Mike Russell wrote:
>>> "gecko" <alpha@olympus.net> wrote in message
>>> news:b2qis31ifcv44sm9a5dt9p28ang9o9hhds@4ax.com...
>>> ...
>>>> dots will be huge. Anyone who doesn't recognize 234 dpi as a
>>>> serious quality problem doesn't deserve to have Photoshop CS.
>>> ...
>>> LOL - doubly undeserving I, then, with CS2? In any case, I'll leave
>>> further responses to more qualified individuals.
>>
>> Heh, thank the ghods you don't use CS3, we'd have to send the image
>> police to work you over.
>
> I gotta fess up - I do have CS3, though when the cops arrive, I would
> plead that at least it's not the extended version.

Well then, perhaps you'll only suffer the abbreviated cudgelling.

>> Somehow, I have a sneaky suspicion that those "more qualified
>> individuals" are all extremely busy right this minute, though,
>> despite the impeccable manners of gecko's "friend".
>
> I have a friend who's cranky that way - "not suffering fools gladly,
> and just about everyone is a fool". Hopefully, as is the case with
> my friend, there are mitigating qualities in addition to his
> impeccable manners, such as being a genius. Anyway, I like geckos.

Don't know as I'm a genius, but I don't see 234 dpi as a "serious" quality
problem in all printing instances either.

--
dvus