70 separate images,649 frames... is going to end up as a pretty/very big
image. Those numbers alone would make me think that Flash is a far better
option.

Peter
_____________________
"clockwerker" <webforumsuser@macromedia.com> wrote in message
news:fpn45d$sk5$1@forums.macromedia.com...
| hi alex, no, it doesn't need to reflect real time, I just wanted it to
run, i
| was going to give each frame 100/100 seconds so that it would tick
naturally,
| but just start at noon. so it won't run for 24 hours, it will just run for
| almost 60 minutes before restarting. thanks.
|