A GIF would certainly be better for text than a JPG and smaller too, but
either approach is the wrong one, honestly.
--
Murray --- ICQ 71997575
Adobe Community Expert
(If you *MUST* email me, don't LAUGH when you do so!)
==================
http://www.projectseven.com/go - DW FAQs, Tutorials & Resources
http://www.dwfaq.com - DW FAQs, Tutorials & Resources
==================
"josie1one" <joleros@spamoffyahoo.com> wrote in message
news:ftkl2c$bj5$1@forums.macromedia.com...
> >...so I did a jpeg. But it took long time to load
>
> You can reduce most jpegs to small files with optimisation in an
> image-editing programme such as PaintShop Pro, Photoshop or Fireworks,
> playing with the numbers and getting the balance right between size and
> quality. I'm not suggesting this is better than text btw.
>
> --
> Jo
>
>
>
> "Karlhevera" <webforumsuser@macromedia.com> wrote in message
> news:ftkgpt$5i1$1@forums.macromedia.com...
>> Interesting... I had a fair amount of text, so I did a jpeg. But it took
>> long time to load. So went back to text.
>
>