dorayme wrote:
> In article
> <doraymeRidThis-95AA2C.15362801042008@news-vip.optusnet.com.au>,
> dorayme <doraymeRidThis@optusnet.com.au> wrote:
>
>> Well, "she" (and much more correctly "it") should have been changed by
>> me to Strict and it - no, not me! the other it, the html doc it - is now
>> Strict. So thanks Jeff.
>
> should really read
>
> Well, "she" (and much more correctly "it") should have changed it - no,
> not me! the other it, the html doc it. It is now Strict. So thanks Jeff.

Hmm, I don't think we've discussed the gender of html docs before.
Although I can certainly understand the confusion behind what gender a
transitional page is!

Jeff
>