> maybe I'm focusing on the wrong thing here the only real goal I do have is
> to
> get my sites that are mostly flash to be found by search engines in some
> way.

The code you mention would have nothing to do with search engine visibility.
What determines your SERP is the CONTENT on the page. If your page is
all-Flash, you basically have NO content on the page (since search engines
cannot read Flash content). The information in the <title> tag *is*
critically important, yes, but a title alone will NOT get you a good
ranking. I think you are discovering why one should not do all Flash sites
without also buying placements and getting good incoming links - that's your
only alternative, I think.

--
Murray --- ICQ 71997575
Adobe Community Expert
(If you *MUST* email me, don't LAUGH when you do so!)
==================
http://www.projectseven.com/go - DW FAQs, Tutorials & Resources
http://www.dwfaq.com - DW FAQs, Tutorials & Resources
==================


"187 (Elite)" <webforumsuser@macromedia.com> wrote in message
news:fqf2v1$mcq$1@forums.macromedia.com...
> Hi every one I use dreamweaver mainly as place holder for my flash sites.
> In
> the passed I use the title statment in my HTML pages to search
> engines
> find my sites. But I don't know if this is new to CS3 or not but now it
> seems
> that the <Title> statment in the HTML page is no longer valid at pulling
> any
> search results. One thing I have noticed in comparing meta tags with DR8
> and DR
> CS3 is this:
>
> DR8:
> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1" />
>
> vs.
>
> DRCS3:
> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
>
> maybe I'm focusing on the wrong thing here the only real goal I do have is
> to
> get my sites that are mostly flash to be found by search engines in some
> way.
> As always I"m gratfull for any and totaly open to any new ideas any
> one
> might have
>
> Thx
>
> John
>