Ben Bacarisse wrote:
> "filia&sofia" <in_tyrannos@hotmail.com> writes:
>
>> Nice to have .
>
> I though you got a pretty good answer last time. At least say why
> is was unsuitable or what is wrong with what you've already tried. It
> may be that you are aiming for something that is impossible.
> [...]

He says that he wants to avoid using "for" because it's
a "slow operation." Go figure.

--
Eric Sosman
esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid