Those are R2 characteristics, not for the first version of Windows 2003.
I was confused and I thought that in the scenario the R2 version was not
present.
Cheers
--
augusto alvarez | it pro | southworks
http://staff.southworks.net/aalvarez
"Charlie Russel - MVP" <charlie@mvKILLALLSPAMMERSps.org> wrote in message
news:315D84B5-2D4F-4434-83D6-0A7F25CD7C37@microsoft.com...
> Incorrect. x64 Editions support more. Standard supports 32gb in x64, 2 TB
> of RAM in Enterprise.
> http://www.microsoft.com/technet/win...s/compare.mspx
>
>
>
> --
> Charlie.
> http://msmvps.com/xperts64
> http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile/charlie.russel
>
>
> "Augusto Alvarez" <augusto.alvarez82@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:eVog2qmdIHA.3772@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
>> Windows 2003 Standard Edition supports up to 4gb of RAM. Enterprise
>> editions supports 32gb RAM, for 32bit; and 64gb of RAM for 64bits.
>>
>> If you have 2gb of RAM and you try to host those two virtual machines,
>> assigning each 512mb of RAM or 768mb I dont think you will receive a
>> proper performance. None less of 1gb RAM each I think.
>>
>> Hope it s
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>> --
>> augusto alvarez | it pro | southworks
>> http://staff.southworks.net/aalvarez
>>
>> "Cyril" <daghood@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:BD296684-BA2C-4DB9-AF9F-A77751E9E938@microsoft.com...
>>> What do you mean more than 4gb of ram.
>>>
>>> Should I go for 6 or 8 GB ?
>>>
>>> What's the maximum amount of ram supported by a Windows server 2003?
>>>
>>> Thanks again for ing
>>>
>>> Dag
>>>
>>> "Charlie Russel - MVP" <charlie@mvKILLALLSPAMMERSps.org> a écrit dans le
>>> message de news:99308FB3-E905-4077-B12D-B1ACE3B0663F@microsoft.com...
>>>> I'd strongly recommend going to x64 Edition for the host server here.
>>>> The OP is going to need more than 2 GB of RAM, and really will want
>>>> more than 4 GB. And there shouldn't be an issue with drivers for that
>>>> server.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Charlie.
>>>> http://msmvps.com/xperts64
>>>> http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile/charlie.russel
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Danny Sanders" <DSanders@NOSPAMciber.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:eZ9ZXqZdIHA.5348@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
>>>>>> My physical server is a DELL poweredge 2950, server 2003 STD
>>>>>
>>>>> As an FYI if you put Win 2k3 Enterprise on the physical server the
>>>>> licensing will cover 4 virtual machines, Win 2k3 Standard, you would
>>>>> have to buy a license for a fifth server.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> My physical server is a DELL poweredge 2950, server 2003 STD, 2GB RAM
>>>>>> and 3x
>>>>>> 146GB scsi 15'00 rpm hard disk (raid 5), dual PSU.
>>>>>
>>>>> I would install Win 2k3 Enterprise on the physical server and bump up
>>>>> the RAM to at least 4 GB if not 6 and use the /PAE switch.
>>>>>
>>>>> It should work but I would suggest making you virtual host servers Win
>>>>> 2k3 Enterprise because it supports more RAM and the 4 OS's covered
>>>>> under the Enterprise licensing. It would not be out of the question to
>>>>> go with Win 2k3 x64 Enterprise.
>>>>>
>>>>> hth
>>>>> DDS
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> "Cyril" <daghood@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>> news:3883984C-11DB-4D13-A383-C34934E5BE1D@microsoft.com...
>>>>>> Hi to all of you,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Is it possible to install MOSS 2007 enterprise on a virtual machine
>>>>>> ??
>>>>>>
>>>>>> My physical server is a DELL poweredge 2950, server 2003 STD, 2GB RAM
>>>>>> and 3x
>>>>>> 146GB scsi 15'00 rpm hard disk (raid 5), dual PSU.
>>>>>> The same machine would be hosting MOSS 2007 and SQL server standard !
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 1) Would that work?
>>>>>> 2) Has any of you done it?
>>>>>> 3) any performance issue?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I am using most of the functionalities of MOSS 2007 but with a few
>>>>>> users (30
>>>>>> to 50) ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Do you think it would be possible?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks a lot for ing me
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Dag
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>