In news:ff16fb66952118ca660481fb118c@msnews.microsoft .com,
Meinolf Weber <meiweb(nospam)@gmx.de> typed:
> Hello Ace Fekay [MVP],
>
> thanks also from me about the explanation about ICS on a server and
> the consequences.
> Just a small remark, some years ago when i started with networking
> and domains, i also used ICS on a Domain controller(multihomed) and have
> disabled
> the ICS-DHCP. So it was no problem to use the internal DHCP/DNS services
> with a different scope then 192.168.x.x
>
> Best regards
>
> Meinolf Weber

Hi Meinolf,

My pleasure for the explanation. I tried using ICS many years ago too and I
found it was a royal PITA (pain in the butt) because of it's nuances. I've
stayed away from it ever since, especially that NAT services are available
under RRAS.

Disabling ICS-DHCP and using an internal DHCP/DNS is a good idea if using
ICS and the way to go. The only scenario I see a problem with is using ICS
on a DC because it would invoke those eventIDs because of DNS services
conflicts. Also with ICS, unless SP2 or a recent update changed it which I
am not aware of, I do not believe you can change the default 192.168.1.1/24
IP and subnet assignment.for the internal NIC. I would actually use NAT can
be controlled better.

Ace