On 03/24/08 11:16, Andrzej Adam Filip wrote:
> Thank you for pointing out I have quoted misleading documentation
> *without* making it less misleading.

I'm sorry for being misleading. I was trying to make others aware that
things were *not as they seem* *prior* to someone depending on them.

Rather than stating false information I was stating what limited
information I had (/ have) available at the (/ this) time.

My previous testing on the "compat_check" / "check_compat" ruleset and /
or routine did not behave as you might think. My testing was along the
lines of recipient does not want messages from sender and to return a
specific error to that effect. However the message was refused at the
SMTP level with a generic non descript error that was not what I wanted
returned.

I'm sorry that I don't have more details than that as it has been more
than a year since I tried. At the point in time that I found that the
error message was the generic non descript I found a different solution
to my needs.



Grant. . . .