PHWinfo - Afficher un message - initializer Vs assignment list in constructor

16/01/2008, 08h09

On Tue, 15 Jan 2008 22:51:15 -0800 (PST), Pallav singh
<singh.pallav@gmail.com> wrote in comp.lang.c++:

> How can we justify that initializer list is better in performance
> than assignment list in constructor of C++ ??

Why would we want to justify it? The C++ standard does not specify or
require such a thing.

An initializer list is the preferred way to initialize the members in
a constructor. It is the only possible way to initialize reference
members and constant members. So just use initializer lists.

--
Jack Klein
Home: http://JK-Technology.Com
FAQs for
comp.lang.c http://c-faq.com/
comp.lang.c++ http://www.parashift.com/c++-faq-lite/
alt.comp.lang.learn.c-c++
http://www.club.cc.cmu.edu/~ajo/docs/FAQ-acllc.html

16/01/2008, 08h09	#2
Jack Klein Messages: n/a Hébergeur:	Re: initializer Vs assignment list in constructor On Tue, 15 Jan 2008 22:51:15 -0800 (PST), Pallav singh <singh.pallav@gmail.com> wrote in comp.lang.c++: > How can we justify that initializer list is better in performance > than assignment list in constructor of C++ ?? Why would we want to justify it? The C++ standard does not specify or require such a thing. An initializer list is the preferred way to initialize the members in a constructor. It is the only possible way to initialize reference members and constant members. So just use initializer lists. -- Jack Klein Home: http://JK-Technology.Com FAQs for comp.lang.c http://c-faq.com/ comp.lang.c++ http://www.parashift.com/c++-faq-lite/ alt.comp.lang.learn.c-c++ http://www.club.cc.cmu.edu/~ajo/docs/FAQ-acllc.html