PHWinfo - Afficher un message

15/01/2008, 22h03

Ioannis Vranos wrote:
> Interesting link on C++0x indeed:
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C%2B%2B0x

However I am a bit troubled from this:

"Standard C++ offers two kinds of string literals. The first kind,
contained within double quotes, produces a null-terminated array of type
const char. The second kind, defined as, L"", produces a null-terminated
array of type const wchar_t, where wchar_t is a wide-character. Neither
literal type offers support for Unicode-encoded string literals".

AFAIK, wchar_t supports the largest character set provided by the
system. So AFAIK wchar_t is Unicode on systems supporting Unicode. Am I
wrong somewhere?

15/01/2008, 22h03	#10
Ioannis Vranos Messages: n/a Hébergeur:	Re: next ISO C++ standard Ioannis Vranos wrote: > Interesting link on C++0x indeed: > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C%2B%2B0x However I am a bit troubled from this: "Standard C++ offers two kinds of string literals. The first kind, contained within double quotes, produces a null-terminated array of type const char. The second kind, defined as, L"", produces a null-terminated array of type const wchar_t, where wchar_t is a wide-character. Neither literal type offers support for Unicode-encoded string literals". AFAIK, wchar_t supports the largest character set provided by the system. So AFAIK wchar_t is Unicode on systems supporting Unicode. Am I wrong somewhere?