Daniel Kaplan wrote:
> "Paul Lautman" <paul.lautman@btinternet.com> wrote in message
> news:5tq8p0F1enbnnU1@mid.individual.net...
>
>
>> If you had entered my answer correctly, there is no way that any value in
>> the ON could have been labelled as ambiguous sice in my example they were
>> all qualified.
>>
>> If you post your attempt at my answer and the corresponding error, message
>> I will tell you what you did wrong and you just might learn something from
>> your betters.
>>
>> Alternatively keep being pig-headed and stew in your own juice!
>
>
>
> Why should I bother?
>
> I don't want a flame war, but people like you shouldn't post here or
> elsewhere. You may know most of the answers, but your rudeness is a perfect
> example of what's wrong with newsgroups and people who with e-spines.
>
>
>

Daniel,

Paul is one of the most knowledgeable and respected persons in this
newsgroup. He consistently volunteers significant amounts of time to
answer peoples questions.

And he did answer your question. If you would have followed his advice,
you would have your answer.

Rather, you ignored his response, criticized his code for something that
would not happpen if you had entered his code correctly. And all you
did was say it didn't work - without posting the code you actually used
and the real error message you received.

No, Paul is not at fault here.

--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
JDS Computer Training Corp.
jstucklex@attglobal.net
==================